The decedent, William, died on February 19, 2014. In 2006, he executed a Will naming his three children (Andrew, Zelda and Jonathan) from a prior marriage as beneficiaries. The children’s mother was deceased. William was married at his death to Frances. They were married for 33 years. Some time before William died, he suffered from several illnesses which included severe anxiety and depression, post-traumatic stress disorder from his service during World War II, mild to moderate dementia, impaired hearing and frequent urinary tract infections. As a result of his health issues, William was hospitalized at a residential psychiatric facility. In October of 2011, Frances filed an involuntary application for the appointment of a conservator of her husband’s person and estate. Following a hearing, a Connecticut Probate Court appointed her to be her husband’s conservator.
See more...
Tuesday, April 30, 2019
Can a Conservator Sue for a Divorce on Behalf of a Conserved Person?
In 2009, two sisters brought an involuntary petition before a Connecticut Probate Court to have their father conserved. Jeannine sought appointment as the conservator of her father’s person, so that she could make decisions regarding her father’s health and well-being. Her sister, Jennifer, sought appointment as the conservator of her father’s estate, so that she could pay his bills. The Court granted the sisters’ petition and appointed each of them to the roles that they were seeking.
Approximately one week later, the father’s wife and the mother of the two sisters, sued the father for a dissolution of marriage (hereinafter a “divorce”). In the complaint, the wife, Gloria, alleged that her husband was incompetent. She named Jeannine and Jennifer as defendants, as conservators for her husband. Approximately one month later, the sisters on behalf of their father filed a cross complaint seeking a divorce. Some months later, Gloria filed a motion to dismiss the cross complaint, claiming that Jeannine and Jennifer could not bring a divorce action against her on behalf of their father. In their objection, the sisters claimed that a conservator does have the right to bring a divorce action on behalf of a conserved person because they were acting in his best interests. The trial court agreed with the wife and granted her motion to dismiss. Jeannine and Jennifer appealed this decision to the Connecticut Appellate Court. The issue for the Court was whether conservators of an involuntarily conserved person can seek a divorce on behalf of the conserved person.
Approximately one week later, the father’s wife and the mother of the two sisters, sued the father for a dissolution of marriage (hereinafter a “divorce”). In the complaint, the wife, Gloria, alleged that her husband was incompetent. She named Jeannine and Jennifer as defendants, as conservators for her husband. Approximately one month later, the sisters on behalf of their father filed a cross complaint seeking a divorce. Some months later, Gloria filed a motion to dismiss the cross complaint, claiming that Jeannine and Jennifer could not bring a divorce action against her on behalf of their father. In their objection, the sisters claimed that a conservator does have the right to bring a divorce action on behalf of a conserved person because they were acting in his best interests. The trial court agreed with the wife and granted her motion to dismiss. Jeannine and Jennifer appealed this decision to the Connecticut Appellate Court. The issue for the Court was whether conservators of an involuntarily conserved person can seek a divorce on behalf of the conserved person.
Saturday, February 9, 2019
Pregnancy and Estate Planning
How Does a Pregnancy Impact Your Connecticut Advanced Directive?
A few years ago, you went to a lawyer who prepared an estate plan for you. You
signed a couple of advanced directives known as a living will and an appointment of
health care representative. Time passed and in 2018, you became pregnant.
Then you learned that in that year the Connecticut General Assembly amended the
statutes that govern advanced directives. Does this amendment impact your
advanced directives in light of your pregnancy?
Here is what you need to know.
For more tips on Probate in Southeastern Connecticut see the blog at bmre.us/probate.
signed a couple of advanced directives known as a living will and an appointment of
health care representative. Time passed and in 2018, you became pregnant.
Then you learned that in that year the Connecticut General Assembly amended the
statutes that govern advanced directives. Does this amendment impact your
advanced directives in light of your pregnancy?
Here is what you need to know.
For more tips on Probate in Southeastern Connecticut see the blog at bmre.us/probate.
Labels:
Probate Attorney,
Probate Groton,
Probate New London,
Probate Niantic,
Probate Norwich,
Probate Real Estate,
Probate southeastern CT
Location:
New London, CT 06320, USA
Tuesday, January 29, 2019
New Statutory Powers for Advanced Practice Registered Nurses
On October 1, 2018, a new law became effective as it applies to
certain advanced directives. The change gives advanced practice
registered nurses the authority to perform certain functions that could
previously only be performed by physicians.
Public Act 18-168 (“the Act”) defines an advanced practice registered
nurse (a/k/a APRN) to mean an advanced practice registered nurse
licensed under Connecticut law who is selected by or assigned to a patient
and has the primary responsibility for the treatment and care of that patient.
Labels:
Probate Attorney,
Probate Groton,
Probate New London,
Probate Niantic,
Probate Norwich,
Probate Real Estate,
Probate southeastern CT
Location:
New London, CT 06320, USA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)